The above information is enough to make any thinking Christian cringe at the audacity of W&H, Jesuits, and all who have insinuated their foul heresies into the churches. But I say to you, love your enemies, do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and abuse you., (3) AMERICAN REVISED. Anthony A. Hoekema, The Four Major Cults, Christian Science, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormonism, Seventh-day Adventism, William B. Eerdmans, 1963. "[97], In 1960, Frederick William Danker wrote, "not to be snubbed is the New World Translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, Rendered from the Original by the New World Translation Committee 'the orthodox' do not possess all the truth, yet one does well to 'test the spirits'. . He believed the same as Origen. It contains nearly all the New Testament, the Apocryphal Books plus two other false books, The Shepherd of Hermes and The Epistle of Barnabas. Every page contains corrections and revisions by at least ten different people. they are three of the most scandalously corrupt copies extant [exhibiting] the most shamefully mutilated texts which are anywhere to be met with.(Burgon, True Or False? He writes concerning the Sinaiticus.. From the facts, therefore, we deduce: first that the IMPURITY of the codex Sinaiticus, in every part of it, was fully recognized by those who were best acquainted with it, and that from the very beginning until the time when it was finally cast aside as worthless for the practical purpose. Remember, too, that both W&H were entranced by the theories of Charles Darwin. Rome began its onslaught against scripture very early on in its heretical career, by ignoring the accepted canon of Gods word and replacing it with the Alexandrian text, which was shunned by true believers from the beginning because of its heresy: Rome received the corrupted Local Text of Alexandria, Egypt, and further revised it to suit her own needs. The Oxford Movement, one that we see is of Roman/Jesuit origin, corrupted the Anglican church by teaching its future priests in the ways of Rome. One might wonder how these men could so lie through their teeth. A man named Erasmus, a brilliant scholar and. Part of the story is that within one year of his exodus, over 150 clergy and laymen also crossed over to join him.(W.P. In addition to their many doctrinal heresies, strong evidence exists from the writings of both Westcott and Hort that they were involved in occult activities during the time they prepared their Greek New Testament. This is exactly what the new version writers did to the KJAV and its original sources! (See YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtUfgtgB_Is). Westcott and Horts Greek New Testament is the source text for many of todays modern Bible translations. [44][45], At the Watch Tower Society's annual meeting on October 5, 2013, a significantly revised translation was released. ", Perth, Western Australia. 77-78). cit., Vol. He used the corrupted manuscripts of Egypt to make his Bibles for the Roman Catholic Church. Rome employed Jerome, to distort the true scriptures even more. The Jesuits, like Rome itself, hate scripture with a deep and dark satanic passion. Remember that the Revised Version was the brainchild of Westcott and Hort. "[98], In 1981, biblical scholar Benjamin Kedar-Kopfstein stated that the Old Testament work is largely based on the formal structure of biblical Hebrew. [80], In 1992, a digital edition of the New World Translation of the Holy ScripturesWith References was released on floppy disk. 1860 May 1st Hort to Lightfoot: If you make a decided conviction of the absolute infallibility of the N.T. The timid purpose was slyly subverted by Westcott and Hort's fiery desire to overthrow the authority of the King James Bible. The face of the virgin is unspeakably beautiful. And when we learn that the NIV was worked on by homosexuals, we see not just corruption in modern versions, but a pit of damnation that no genuine believer can touch. I have shown in many articles that W&H, Tischendorf and others stand condemned by their own hearts, words and work. The Gothic version of Ulfilas, in the same way, held its own until the tongues in which it was written ceased to exist.(Forum, June 1887). 3031), How Can You Choose a Good Bible Translation? Therefore, marshalling together a number of recent New Testaments by different editors to support a changed passage in the Revised, proves nothing: perhaps they all have followed the same Greek New Testament reading. They used corrupt sources calling it new Greek! "The Compact DiscWhat Is It All About? One need only read the letters between these two "gentlemen" to see their thoroughly black-hearted correspondence and intent to confuse and change God's Word. Maurice was a dedicated Unitarian minister who had been discharged from Kings College because of his atheistic teachings, yet was appointed to the Revised Version Committee through Horts influence. The foundation of our faith is the truth of Gods Word.(pbministries.org), In Antioch (Syria); where the followers of Christ were first called Christians, the true believers were making exact copies of the original manuscripts. But, its main reason for support of evolution is that it contradicts scripture and the KJAV! This is nothing but the old childrens story brought to reality The Kings New Clothes! Nov. 17th Westcott: As far as I could judge, the idea of La Salette was that of God revealing Himself now, and not in one form but in many. (Life, Vol.I. Not only will you know more about the Jesuits and their activities, you will become more acquainted with yourself, the problems with the visible church, Revelation 17, and these end times.). Constantin von Tischendorf was a leading light in the emerging Higher Critical movement in Germany in the 19thcentury. Reprinted with kind permission from theTraditional Text Pamphlets Homepage and compiled byDavid Blunt of the James Begg Society. [23][24][25] The Watch Tower Society is said to have "become aware" of the committee's existence a year later. Their views on Scripture and the Text are highlighted. 1851 Dec. 29,30th Hort: I had no idea till the last few weeks of the importance of texts, having read so little Greek Testament, and dragged on with the villainous Textus Receptus. Test. Simon is the forerunner of modern Biblical criticism.(Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. Both of these underpin all modern versions. The English mission, a bold attempt to reclaim England for Catholicism during the reign (1558 1603) of Elizabeth I, was led by Edmund Campion and included the poet Robert Southwell. These serious accusations are made with very strong evidence from the letters of both . Of course, their influence had also spread to English politics. [19] Additionally, over the centuries since the King James Version was produced, more copies of earlier manuscripts of the original texts in the Hebrew and Greek languages have become available. [77] Production of the NWT in American Sign Language began in 2006; the New Testament was made available by 2010,[78][79] and the complete ASL edition was released in February 2020. [28][53] Headings were included at the top of each page to assist in locating texts; these have been replaced in the 2013 revision by an "Outline of Contents" introducing each Bible book. Both Westcott and Hort loved Rome and Mary. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you., (2) JESUIT VERSION. Together, they produced The New Testament in the Original Greek, one of the earliest examples of modern textual criticism. Most of our other colleges and universities in North America have, since the early 1980s, swung into the orbit. "[92], Regarding the New World Translation's use of English in the first volume of the New World Translation of the Hebrew Scriptures (Genesis to Ruth, 1953), biblical scholar Harold Henry Rowley was critical of what he called "wooden literalism" and "harsh construction". July 1st Westcott to Hort: The Revision on the whole surprised me by prospects of hope. Wiseman was responsible for the conversion of hundreds of English Protestants, including Prime Minister William Gladstone (1809-1898), Archbishop Richard Chenevix Trench (1807-1886), and John Newman (1801-1890). It was the Christians who replaced the Tetragrammaton by Kyrios, when the divine name written in Hebrew letters was not understood any more. That is, if the manuscript is not a forgery, as seems highly probable! Some want you to think there is little difference between the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts and the rest of the over 5,000 Greek manuscripts, even Hort wanted people to believe that, and tried to say so in certain words, that some still quote today, BUT the TRUTH OF THE MATTER is CLEAR TO SEE for the scholars who will open their eyes to see the PLAIN truth., We need to note here that Dr.Hort, while a life-long opponent of the Received Text, and the man who dominated the English NT Revision Committee, did say this: An OVERWHELMING proportion of the text in all known cursive manuscripts except a few is, as a matter of fact, IDENTICAL (Horts Introduction, p.143). May 5th Westcott to Hort: at present I find the presumption in favour of the absolute truth I reject the word infallibility of Holy Scripture overwhelming. (Life, Vol.I, p.207). Jude 1:3 earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. (1) KING JAMES BIBLE OF 1611. British textual criticism, a focused attack on the text, especially of the New Testament. These were called Tracts for the Times, and were written between 1833 and 1841. Upon his return to England, on July 9, 1833, the Oxford Movement began. Under the direction of the Translation Services Department, translation of the Old Testament in a particular language may be completed in as little as two years. Westcott and Hort were responsible for the greatest feat in textual criticism. so-called easy-to-read Bible versions have been corrupted by Luciferian-worshipping occultists. However, the scholars of the day all wanted Cartwright; they needed a solid answer to the Jesuits and so sent a formal request to him (Brookes Cartwright, p 260). In Britain, a different approach was taken by men who also chose to think themselves smarter than Gods Word. And what of these quotes by, or about, Westcott? In 1851, Hort and Westcott started the Ghost Society which over the years included some of the most influential intellectuals in England including future Prime Minister Arthur Balfour. I. BROOKE FOSS WESTCOTT (1825-1901) A. Hort ordained priest in Church of England. "[122], According to the February 1, 1998 issue of The Watchtower, Jason BeDuhn ordered copies of the KIT for his students at Indiana University Bloomington, and wrote that "it is the best interlinear New Testament available".[139][140]. "[56] However, according to professor Albert Pietersma, since pre-Christian times adonai and the Tetragrammaton were considered equivalent to the Greek term kyrios. The new versions are all foul, for they take us away from truth and genuine sources of truth, to the winding and rocky paths of Roman Catholic lies, and towards atheism and paganism. They were wicked, and later new version committees carried on this evil. How can they, when the very bibles they use are from the clawed hands of Jesuits and Rome? but I seem instinctively to feel its improbability, and discover some want of evidence in the account of it. (Life, Vol.I, p.52). Answer:He is the Vicar of Christ, the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, and there is but one Judgment-Seat belonging to God and the Pope.. And God said: "Let there be light." [91], George D. Chryssides stated in 2019 that the unfavourable criticisms by Harold Henry Rowley, Julius R. Mantey and William Barclay "were extremely vague", but that Bruce M. Metzger "mentioned a few specific passages which he believed were wrongly translated. It is very small, with one kneeling-place, and behind a screen was a Pieta the size of life (i.e. Julius Robert Mantey, Depth Exploration in the New Testament, Vantage Press, 1980, R. Rhodes, The Challenge of the Cults and New Religions, The Essential Guide to Their History, Their Doctrine, and Our Response, Zondervan, 2001, p. 94.